First of all, it's not an asset class, says Charlie O'Donnell. Gotta love this rant, dripping with unconcealed contempt and biting irony. Sample:
If you have money or connections to other people's money, you too can be a VC or superangel or whatever you want to call it. With such stringent restrictions and that high of a bar, is it any wonder that lots of ridiculous stuff got funded and isn't making it to the next level?
And when our best engineers and creative talents spend tons of venture capital money to analyze the complex web of social relationships, just to show them discount yoga deals, or use social location data to crowdsource the best artesianal brussel sprout pop up shop, isn't it more of a failure of the individuals behind these companies themselves than there is something inherently wrong with the "asset class" or that there's an industrywide lack of investor interest in VC.
I agree with a lot of what he says and a lot else isn't applicable to our part of the world (e.g., entrepreneurs who've "made it" here still love sinking their moolah into real estate rather than turn angel, unlike where he comes from).
I rant like this myself about some of these points and others that are more specific to my own day-to-day, but I mostly do it in person, rarely online. Too lazy, too busy, too procrastinaty, can't be arsed, take your pick.
Link: Don't blame the game, blame the playas